Posts Tagged ‘motorbike’

How to change solicitor

Friday, July 23rd, 2010

One question I am asked very often is: ‘How do you change solicitors?’

In these Pod Casts I concentrate on questions that have been raised on the forum to discuss legal issues in relation to motorcycling and accidents.  As you know I am a Specialist Motorcycle Accident Lawyer and I look after people who have been knocked off their bike and often sustained catastrophic injuries and need their lives rebuilding.

One question has come off the forum this week, it’s been a question about somebody who has already instructed solicitors and has asked can they transfer the case and if so what are the consequences.  This is a question I come across two or three or more times a week, nowadays what happens is bikers when they have an accident do the knee jerk reaction everybody does, they ring their insurers.  Everybody believes you have got to ring your insurers and it can be good sense, but the problem with that is that the insurers will quickly get to grips with the case and find out whether it is a none fault case and whether there has been an injury sustained.  If that is so they will say to the customer or their insured that they will put them in touch with a solicitor, they may even say that they have legal expense insurance for that purpose.  People will then end up in the hands of a solicitor that they haven’t chosen that has just been selected by the insurers and what actually happens behind the scenes is that the insurers will charge the solicitor £800.00 or so just to receive the case; that’s called a referral fee.  I personally don’t like it and I don’t do it, but that’s how people end up in the hands of solicitors.

The solicitor is not selected because they are good, they are not selected because they know anything about bikes and bike accidents and the idiosyncrasies of bike accidents, they are selected just because they have paid the insurers a sum of money.  So the poor unfortunate client ends up with those solicitors who may not be up to the job and it is a sad reality that there are good and bad solicitors and I come across it all the while where people have a case in with a solicitor that has become difficult and the solicitor has merely put it in his filing cabinet and not done much about it.

So the way I advise clients is that it would be very easy for me to say that I am the best Lawyer in the World and everyone should transfer their case to me but that would be wrong.  What you should do is try and address any concerns with your solicitor, contact them, speak to the person dealing with the case, if they are not senior try and speak to somebody more senior.  Every firm of solicitors has a complaints procedure they have got to have that, the Solicitors Regulation Authority insists upon it, so try and use that to try and get some satisfaction as to what’s happening on your case and why you haven’t got any answers.  If you can’t resolve your complaint like that then you should look at changing, you have a right to be represented by a solicitor of your choosing.  Now if you want that to be a solicitor who specialises in bike accidents make sure you choose that solicitor very carefully you do not want to jump from the frying pan into the fire.

If you want to transfer your case the solicitor acting for you is probably acting on a conditional fee agreement and or on legal expenses and you can transfer, see your new solicitor tell them about the case, tell them you are dissatisfied and you have lost confidence with your solicitor and they will ask you to fill in a very simple authority which authorises them to get the papers from your previous solicitor.  What they then do is they write to that solicitor with that authority and give the original solicitor an undertaking to look after their costs at the end of the case and that is just about it.  You should get the file of papers and your new solicitors should be up and running, they will review those papers and get on with the case and hopefully you will be more satisfied.  You only get one chance when you issue court proceedings to achieve the maximum amount on your case so it should be in the right hands.

If you have any more questions about that or wish to speak with me directly you can contact me through the website www.lampkins.co.uk and click on the ask a question button.  You can also contact me via Twitter at ‘Compensateme’ on the twitter system, also if you want to subscribe via iTunes search for Mark Lampkin’s Biker Pod Cast and you will find this and other important questions on bike accident cases.

 
icon for podpress  How to change solicitor [4:19m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

The new UK Motorcycle test

Friday, July 16th, 2010

In my second edition of my biker podcast I discuss legal issues arising in the biker world. I am a Specialist Motorcycle Accident Lawyer and represent loads of clients who have had accidents and often catastrophic injuries caused by the negligence of other drivers and I and my practice just dedicate ourselves to looking after and restoring their lives and getting them back on the road.

This episode is about the new motorcycle test and I have had a case this week that has caused me a real concern and I have instructions to act on behalf of a biker who has suffered horrific injuries and I don’t use that word lightly, sustained whilst practicing for the new motorcycle test.

As a biker you may know that the test was recently revised following a European Union directive and that directive was a very good directive, it was aimed at reducing deaths and serious injuries on the road caused by bike accidents and the European Union wanted a more stringent test where bikers would have to show that they had the skill to swerve and to stop and take emergency evasive action if a car pulled out of a minor road as often happens.

Now when they brought that in the European Union discussed it and said that there should be a test to be done at a reasonable speed which they decreed to be 50kph and its bizarre to say the least that our British representatives didn’t negotiate a reduction of that because 50kph is actually 31.5mph, now it is quite ridiculous that a test has been devised that is in excess of the normal speed limit of our urban roads. So that is the first grave mistake made by the Government but that’s by the by, but that meant that tests couldn’t be carried out on the road so the Government then had to buy and design and change and build Super Centres to have this test performed off road, now these centres are in major cities across the Country where they have bought land, fenced it off and it resembles the size of an outdoor football pitch. Now what happens is that novice riders have to go round a series of cones, go round the bend which is quite tight on one of these centres, as they come round the bend they go through a speed camera at 50kph, then they have to swerve and stop. Many people have been falling off, it’s quite a stringent test, I myself wouldn’t like to really do it and when the weather conditions are wet many people have been skidding and crashing. From the date this came in in April 2009 until January 2010 there were 212 serious incidents where people have fallen from the bike and sustained injuries.

Last week I accepted instructions to act on behalf of a Client Jane Offen who was in Nottingham and was practicing for her test in one of these super centres, as she went to stop something happened we don’t know yet what happened but something happened, she was not able to stop and she had a matter of 2 seconds from then until she hit the fence and as a novice rider she just wasn’t able to take the appropriate action. So she hit the fence, she actually went through the fence which is a solid wire type fence which is quite strong and she has suffered horrific injuries. She has a broken bone in her neck, she has shattered her wrist which has been pinned and plated and she has had a massive debridement of her knee, she has lost a lot of tissue from her knee and you may well see in the press photographs of her because we are organising a major press campaign. She was on life support very lucky to survive, its just horrific injuries.

Now I’ve done basic research into this problem and there has been a lot of discussion about this new test and how dangerous the centres are and this was an accident waiting to happen so I’m looking after her and I am trying to pursue a case probably against the Driving Standards Agency.

If you know anybody who has been affected by the test then please ask them to get in touch with me, you can get me on my website www.lampkins.co.uk where you can find all my details; you can in fact find the press release about this case and pictures of my Client and I hope you have a strong stomach for that. Also of course you can get in touch with us on our Twitter account at ‘Compensateme’ and you can always find our pod casts by logging on to iTunes to ‘Mark Lampkin’s Bikers Pod Casts’ and you can find this and other pod casts. So if you have any information about bike accident tests or any comments to make I would be grateful to receive them or just any support you can give, we may well be organising a petition through the website to get this test changed, its having a dramatic effect on the biking industry, lots of people aren’t taking their test and that is having a dramatic effect on sales figures. There are going to be less bikers on the road and I think as bikers we should all rally round and try and do something about this. Not only because of that but also because as my Client Jane says “She just does not want it to happen to somebody else, it’s only a matter of time before someone actually dies”.

 
icon for podpress  Mark Lampkins Biker Podcast Episode 2 [5:24m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Filtering - Am I In The Wrong?

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

We’ve had an interesting question from a member of our forum Dave Wallis so thanks to Dave for sending this in and it’s a question that I answer three, four, five times a week, probably once a day from enquiries from bikers who have been knocked off and the question is “I had an accident while filtering, am I in the wrong?”

A very simple question there must be a lot behind it, but as I say it’s a very common bike accident situation where a biker comes up on a line of stationery traffic and seeks to progress by making progress either in the middle of two lanes of traffic or down the outside which is more common. It happens a lot in London and major Cities and in fact that is the reason why we ride bikes because we can make progress.

If you take your advanced riding test you would be expected to filter and if you didn’t when you reasonably should have done then you will fail your advanced test. Its about making progress but it is a manoeuvre that requires a very high degree of care you cannot do it on your back wheel at 120mph you have to be going along keeping a good look out. If you are going on the other side of the road of course try not to inconvenience anyone coming the other way.

What often happens is you are going along and you see a gap in the traffic somebody leaves a gap and flashes their lights for somebody to come through the traffic to turn right which is going to be across your path the car comes out usually with gay abandon looking left to try and fit in with the traffic, doesn’t see the biker approaching and pulls right out and either T-bones him or knocks the biker off with the front of his car, a very very common accident.

Now in the past we would start from the Highway Code which says if you are emerging from a minor road onto a major one it is your duty to take account of anyone that is coming so that would be the car driver’s fault. But there was a case in 1976 I think it was the case of Powell versus Moody where the motorcyclist was a Mr Powell going along in a scenario like that and a car pulls out and that case was decided 80% against the biker an 80/20 split against the biker.

Now I myself wrote an article on it and I was contacted by Mr Powell’s son who was actually the pillion passenger on the bike so it was fascinating for me to talk to him and correspond with him about the accident a very famous accident that was quoted by all the insurance companies. So that really trips us up as bike accident lawyers and we have to really go some to show that the biker is taking care in going past the gap. What you should do is you should only go across the gap that has been left if it is really safe to do so, a very high degree of care. I myself have run trials on it and we have won 100% and we have lost 100% on shreds of evidence; how fast the car was emerging, how visible the bike was, how fast the bike was going etc. So it is a very difficult situation but generally we are able to be quite persuasive on it and most people will settle around the 50%. Start from that position and work a way from that. But now we have been heartened by a case of Davis v Scroggin which is a case where a biker was filtering past a long line of traffic and an American tourist who had obviously got bored performed a u-turn directly in front of him without looking and that case was decided 100% in favour of Mr Davis so that gives us heart really as bike accident lawyers to say that we can get good compensation even in a filtering case. So don’t give in if you have had negative advice, call me and I will be happy to advise you on it, it does take very very detailed analysis of the evidence so as I say don’t give up don’t accept the first offer and get professional advice.

So thanks to Dave Wallis for that question I hope its been helpful to you but if you want to ask me a question you can do so via the website www.lampkins.co.uk or you can email me directly at info@lampkinco.co.uk, there is lots of handy advice on my site I’m a Bike Accident Lawyer and I’m sure you will find something that will interest you. You can also follow me on twitter @compensateme and if you wanted to subscribe to the pod cast we are on iTunes just search for the Mark Lampkin Bikers Pod cast and you will get plenty of advice on any bike accident scenario.

 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast [4:30m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

LAMPKIN & CO MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT CLAIM SOLICITORS – ON THE ROAD!

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Motorbike eventAs our motorcycle accident claims department goes from strength to strength, we have decided to go on tour to spread the word further.  Building on our fantastic relationships with customer service focussed motorcycle dealerships, we are planning a series of roadshows and events throughout the summer.

Mark Lampkin, owner of the firm and expert motorcycle accident claims lawyer says “it’s great to get out from behind the desk and go on the road to meet bikers face to face.  As a fellow biker, I just love it!”.

The first event we are attending will be the Thundersprint in Northwich town centre on 8th and 9th May 2010.  We have excellent relationship with J&S Motorcycle Accessories Ltd and we have been appointed to look after any of their customers who are unfortunate enough to have a non fault motorcycle accident and suffer an injury as a result.  We give any such client £250 vouchers to spend at J&S paid for by us as a way of saying thank you for using our motorcycle accident claims department.  J&S are a national firm and provide a national motorcycle accident claims recovery service and work with us in repairing motorcycles and supplying bikes on credit hire where necessary.

At their store in Northwich we will have a stand and will be happy to talk to you if you’ve been involved in a motorcycle accident or want any advice in relation to motorcycle Law.  Come along and get a free keyring at least !

We are also organising a series of ride-outs, liaising with our other affiliate dealerships Route 55 Motorcycles, Colwyn Bay Motorcycles and Bill Smith Motors in Chester.   Building on our excellent customer service, these dealerships have also as pointed us to look after any of their clients who have a motorcycle accident claim and again, we pay for £250 vouchers extra and free for any of those clients.

Nightingale House, Wrexham

Ponderosa, Horse Shoe Pass, Llangollen Our ride-out will take place on 30th May 2010 from each of these dealerships and we will raise money in aid of our chosen charity this year which is Nightingale House Hospice in Wrexham.  The rides will start at the dealerships and will finish at the Ponderosa Café on the Horseshoe Pass which is a famous biker refuge.  There will be trade stands in the car park and we expect hundreds if not thousands of bikes depending on the weather.

Please contact us on 08081 782110 for more information on motorbike accident claims and motorbike accident compensation services from Lampkin and Co Accident Solicitors.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

ONLY FOOLS AND STITCHED UP BIKERS

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010
Mark Lampkin of Lampkin and Co Accident Claim Solicitors

Mark Lampkin of Lampkin and Co Accident Claim Solicitors

Biker’s forums are awash with stories of accident claim nightmares. “My solicitor was rubbish”, “My mate got £5000 for whippy and I only got £1.50 for a broken leg…..” and the old classic “My insurers said I had to use their solicitor…….. I wish I knew….!!!!”.

And that’s the question “I wish I knew” WHAT exactly? Most bikers only have one accident and without detailed knowledge of the shark infested waters of accident claims they have a depressingly high chance of falling into the wrong hands and being another thread on smashedupbikers.com or similar.

I, Mark Lampkin, a Motorcycle Accident Solicitor of 20 years standing have been asked by The Rider’s Digest, to reveal the secrets of accident claims so you will get the right advice when you need it most. Read this or play Russian Roulette with your compensation, its up to you.

So you hear the fatal, or hopefully non-fatal, words “sorry mate I didn’t see you”. You peel yourself off the black stuff and go through the motions of swopping addresses preferably, as opposed to punches please, getting witnesses, calling the police if injured, getting medical attention and sobbing over the crumpled mess you only polished an hour ago. The immediate aftermath of an accident is by its nature a very traumatic time and it is nearly impossible to think dead eye straight when you have more adrenalin pumping through you than a tightrope walker with itchy nuts. But, if you can, preserve as much evidence and details as possible. Carry a pen or mobile phone on every trip as cases can be decided on shreds of evidence: collect shreds: shreds are good: lawyers like shreds!

When you get home is the time to put the kettle on, sit down and remember where you read this and get it out and read it again because what you do next will affect the outcome of your case and how you are dealt with more than whether the Judge does or does not “get it” the night before the trial, another classic explanation for it all going wrong.

You will naturally want to ring your insurers and fall starry eyed under their seductive powers. You will almost inevitably have bought legal expenses cover when you took out your insurance through that pesky meerkat, nodding dog, or very annoying opera singer. If you don’t know, look at your policy and that will be the fifteen quid or so added on. You will have it as it’s almost impossible to get them to remove it and here’s why.

If you ring your insurers, or your legal expenses insurers and explain you were not at fault and have a trashed bike and injuries they will refer your case to a “panel solicitor” and will pocket themselves a nice little earner of a referral fee. Yes most if not all insurers will sell your details to a solicitor of their choosing for a fee of around £800 or so. And what do you get for that? Erm, well, erm nothing actually. What happens is that your case will be sold to the solicitor that has offered your insurers the most money that month to get your case and it matters not to the insurers how good they are, where they are or whether they know a Fazer from a Fireblade.

The way legal expenses works is that the insurance company or broker will normally keep the premium of £15 to £40 as their brokerage fee and the legal expense insurer which is usually another company will make money only from selling your case for this referral fee. The solicitor who buys the case may also have a condition placed on him to run your case on a no win no fee system so the insurers would never have to pay your legal costs anyway! Cushty!

So why should it bother you if your insurers charge your solicitor so much money for nothing but your name? Well, since the government introduced fixed costs for road traffic accident claims, then, depending upon the size of your claim, whatever solicitor does your case they will receive the same amount of costs. Here’s how it works. I know you haven’t done maths since Mr Rogers with the patches on his sleeves baffled you with Pythagoras, but bear with it (why is it only teachers who have those patches, and how much wear is there from leaning on a desk anyhow!)

So lets say Billy Biker gets knocked off and has a minor injury only that settles for say £1500. He uses his insurer’s solicitors as above. They win so they get paid by the other driver’s insurers. In Law the loser pays the winners costs. They get their costs calculated as follows.

Basic Costs £800 + (a figure calculated at 20% of the damages) £300 = £1100

Remember though they will have paid around £800 to get the case in the first place so they could have as little as £300 in real terms to spend on the case.

If however he took the trouble to look for his own solicitor directly and instructed them they would have the full amount to spend on his legal representation.

Now ask yourself this. Where is he most likely to get the best legal service? At his insurer elected firm (£300 real value) or his own (£1100 real value). In a broad Geordie accent “you decide!”

Huge solicitors practices are set up on this gravy train, pile ‘em high sell ‘em cheap churn and burn basis and Lord Justice Jackson, who published his report on all this on 14th January 2010 implores the government to ban these referral fees and that can only, in my view, be a good thing as it will stop vast sums of money which should be spent on looking after accident victims properly being plundered by interfering middlemen

But can I say with certainty that if you choose your own lawyer things will always run smoothly, well unfortunately no. I am asked to take over ‘distressed’ cases that arrive like bags of chips with little evidence of progressive work. I am often in a state of shock and awe at how badly some people are treated by supposed professionals and it is no wonder forums read like the complaints file from T.I.T. (that’s Trotter’s Independent Traders of course). Don’t despair though there are plenty out there who are super efficient, knowledgeable and who I personally would trust with my own case god forbid. In fact my missus has a list together with my will just in case!

So what about the D.I.Y option? Well the ‘at fault’ insurer will happily deal directly with you and if you seriously think they will act benevolently and recompense you to the max then you may as well just say to yourself “This time next year I’ll be a millionaire!” and go and order that Ferrari in your drunken delusion. Some even turn up on your doorstep with a cheque book to buy you off for peanuts!

So, as usual for my columns, I’ll leave you with my top ten tips for getting the best advice and care after an accident.
1. After the big bang, even if you are in bits preserve the evidence. Get witness details or get the Police (if you can persuade them to put that doughnut down and come and help you)

2. Think before you make the first call. If you ring your insurers you probably could be sold to their solicitors. You may be ok with that. You decide.

3. You do NOT have to use your Insurer’s Solicitors although they will try to persuade you that you must (a European case has recently decided this….see, it’s not just about straight bananas!)

4. Don’t fear going direct to a specialist personal injury solicitor that has been recommended to you or that you feel confident in. They should welcome you with open arms and offer to act for you on a true no win no fee system and fund all of your case for you. They get paid by the other side so it is effectively free to you.

5. Be cautious if the other party’s insurer approaches you directly. They may offer you the earth or more likely a bunch of flowers and a book token. Why not get advice from an expert who is definitely on your side and will cost you nothing!

6. Shall I stay or shall I go? If your case is with a solicitor and you have lost confidence in them, can never get hold of them, never get a letter, don’t know what’s happening, they never return your call; then consider changing.

7. Frying pan to fire? Pick your next solicitor carefully and only if you have raised your concerns with your present lawyers and they cannot restore your confidence. Transferring your case is a big step but can be done easily in correspondence between old and new lawyers but make that decision carefully.

8. What should I recover? Dependant upon fault, you should receive whatever financial loss flows from the accident. Repairs, loss of earnings, helmet, clothing etc and compensation for your injuries. But you need to prove everything.

9. How long is a piece of string? If your case is handled properly it will take as long as it takes for your lawyers to be able to advise you how much it is worth and depends on whether liability is fought or if the injuries are serious. It should not however be drawn out because it takes some numpty four months to write a letter. If there is a delay your solicitor should at least tell you why.

10. See you in court! Lots of cases stagnate because the lawyers are scared to start court proceedings. Remember you only have three years from the date of the accident to issue proceedings and if this time has passed it may be difficult if not impossible for your case to be brought.

Now cut this out give it to “her indoors”.

If you have any legal issues you would like addressing in the Rider’s Digest please contact us or email Mark directly at mark@lampkinco.co.uk for future publication.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

KTM 990 Supermoto

Monday, June 22nd, 2009

Motorbike accident claim specialist, Mark Lampkin has taken delivery of a brand new KTM 990 SMT, the first long-distance Supermoto.

Click on the video to see footage of the KTM 990 Supermoto Mark uses every morning to tell listeners to Chester’s Dee 106.3 about traffic problems and accidents.

What’s new with the KTM 990 SMT?

For a start, the whole front fairing is new, meaning long journeys are far more comfortable. Steering is lighter as it is attached directly to the frame, not the handlebars.

The new lower seat - 20mm lower than the SM and SMR - is considerably comfier for both rider and pillion.

Luggage has been addressed well too. The heat shields come with two small mountings, available as an accessory, and there’s a baggage rack available for if you need to carry more.

For pillion, there are handles either side of the one-section seat, and there are heat shields fitted over the twin exhaust.

Mark is passionate about motorbikes and is an expert in the field of motorcycle accident claims and advises you should call Lampkins before you contact your insurance company. Here’s why.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark